Review: Five Arrival Apps Compared — Which One Actually Saves You Time?
We tested five popular arrival and transit apps on arrival tasks: SIM ordering, customs forms, transit navigation, and ride-hailing coordination. Here are the winners and trade-offs.
Review: Five Arrival Apps Compared — Which One Actually Saves You Time?
Travel tech promises to make arrivals seamless, but not every app performs under real-world pressure. We tested five popular arrival and transit apps across 25 arrival tasks in three cities. Our evaluation focused on practicality: speed, reliability, offline capabilities, and data privacy.
"A smooth arrival often depends more on the app network and offline behavior than flashy features."
What we tested
We evaluated the following apps: CityArrival, QuickSIM, TransitGo, TerminalMate, and LocalLanes. Each app was tested on airport Wi-Fi, cellular data and in offline mode after closing background connections. Tasks included ordering a local SIM, filling digital entry forms, finding fastest route to downtown, booking a ride-share, and locating luggage claim.
Scoring criteria
- Speed — how quickly a task can be completed end-to-end.
- Reliability — performance in congested networks and low-signal environments.
- Offline functionality — whether maps and critical info remain accessible offline.
- Privacy — data collected and whether it is shared with third parties.
Winner: TransitGo — best overall for transit and first-mile coordination
TransitGo scored highest on reliability and offline capabilities. The app allows pre-downloaded transit maps and provides curated step-by-step routes from airport gate to a chosen hotel. It integrates local ride-share options and displays official taxi fares for transparency.
Pros
- Strong offline maps and route caching.
- Clear pricing for rides and public transit tickets.
- Fast route recalculation in poor signal.
Cons
- Limited coverage in smaller regional airports.
- Advanced features require account creation.
Runner-up: CityArrival — best for customs and document handling
CityArrival simplifies entry forms and stores passport scans securely. In our test it streamlined the customs declaration process and integrated with airport eGates when supported. Privacy is handled well with local encrypted storage for sensitive data.
Pros
- Pre-fill forms and QR code generation for eGates.
- Encrypted local storage for documents.
Cons
- Some airline partnerships required additional sign-in steps.
QuickSIM and TerminalMate: niche winners
QuickSIM did exactly what it promised — fast ordering of a local eSIM with pickup or instant eSIM provisioning. TerminalMate offered targeted airport terminal maps and amenities, which was helpful for complex hub airports where walking time matters.
LocalLanes: slick UI but trouble in low signal
LocalLanes has an appealing interface and social features like local tips, but during our low-signal trials several core functions failed to refresh, leaving cached but outdated information. Good for pre-planning, less reliable for live coordination.
Privacy notes
Apps that collect passport scans, travel itineraries, and geolocation data pose increased privacy risk. TransitGo and CityArrival had the most transparent policies and offered local storage options. QuickSIM required more personal data for identity verification due to telco requirements — expected but notable.
Final recommendations
- Use TransitGo if you rely on public transit and want a reliable first-mile tool.
- Install CityArrival when you anticipate digital immigration forms or plan to use eGates.
- Download TerminalMate before traveling through large, unfamiliar hubs.
- Keep QuickSIM for countries with eSIM support where you prefer instant connectivity.
Overall verdict
Two or three apps together make the best toolkit. TransitGo plus a document helper like CityArrival covered 90 percent of our test tasks. For privacy-conscious travelers, look for apps that allow local storage of sensitive documents and limit third-party sharing. When selecting tools, prioritize reliability and offline capability over feature count.